A chum sent this along in an email. Don't know where it came from originally (sorry I can't give credit where credit is due), but I thought you'd appreciate some of these brilliant tips. Merry Christmas, y'all!
NOTE: This blog has been moved to https://stepcarefully.wordpress.com/blog-articles/ This Blogger site will occasionally be updated, but please go to the other address for latest posts. This blog is dedicated to helping stressed-out stepparents find and develop healthier ways of living.
My Spouse or My Kids?
My Kids or My Spouse?
You married for love. You married forever. But you never expected your marriage would involve having to choose between your new spouse an...
Showing posts with label food news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food news. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Report: More Kids on Diabetes Meds!
A series of reports in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine paints a scary picture of a nasty trend for our children. According to the Archives April issue, twenty-three percent (23%) more American children are taking diabetes medication than three years ago. That represents an epidemic increase in this damaging, dangerous condition for our next generation. And the highest increases were seen in the younger children observed: those ages 6 to 10 years old!
What do you think that will mean to our economy as these young people grow into adults with the disabilities associated with diabetes? What's more disturbing is the question of quality of life for this great number of our kids who will have the specter of diabetes haunting them all the rest of their lives.
But wait - it gets worse! That number, as alarming as it is, is just the tip of the iceberg. According to Dr. Goutham Rao, clinical director of the Weight Management and Wellness Center at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh these numbers are probably lower than actual cases of childhood diabetes.
What's causing this trend in American children's declining health? History might well label it child abuse by well-meaning parents who insist on feeding their children a highly processed diet rich in sugar, fats, and meat. Additional reports in the Archive state that
A study by the American Medical Association states:
New reports are indicating that cows milk is especially questionable for growing children's health. A report HERE tells more about the dangers of cows milk. Please read it carefully.
The bottom line on this issue of your children's declining health is that the current trend of fast food, highly processed foods, too much sugar and white flour, and animal products as a major food source is damaging and dangerous to their health. If you want to help your children enjoy a healthier, longer life, teach them to eat right.
Yes, modern medicines can prolong life today, but why force your kids to become dependent on a growing pharmaceutical industry and more drugs to stay alive when just eating the right foods can help them even more.
Teach your children well!
What do you think that will mean to our economy as these young people grow into adults with the disabilities associated with diabetes? What's more disturbing is the question of quality of life for this great number of our kids who will have the specter of diabetes haunting them all the rest of their lives.
But wait - it gets worse! That number, as alarming as it is, is just the tip of the iceberg. According to Dr. Goutham Rao, clinical director of the Weight Management and Wellness Center at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh these numbers are probably lower than actual cases of childhood diabetes.
"From personal experience, I can tell you that many parents are extremely uneasy with the idea of their son or daughter taking a lipid-lowering medication for the rest of his or her life. The idea that these problems affect children at all is still unfamiliar to many families."Besides diabetes, the studies show that high blood pressure and high cholesterol are also rising greatly for children ages 6 - 18.
What's causing this trend in American children's declining health? History might well label it child abuse by well-meaning parents who insist on feeding their children a highly processed diet rich in sugar, fats, and meat. Additional reports in the Archive state that
"Reducing intake of sugar-containing beverages should therefore be considered..."And further studies have clearly shown that introducing a vegetarian diet to children at a young age will prevent and protect them from many ailments which are affecting our adult (and now adolescent) population today. Eliminating, or at the very least greatly reducing, milk, dairy, eggs, and animal flesh from a child's diet has been shown to greatly enhance not only their health, but their mental abilities, as well, according to the American Dietetic Association.
A study by the American Medical Association states:
"...differences in the major targeted dietary behaviors for cardiovascular disease (fat intake) and cancer (fruit and vegetables) ... suggest that vegetarian adolescents, similar to their adult counterparts, have dietary patterns that, if maintained, could significantly lower their risk of the leading causes of death as adults."Growing children need a varied and a specifically complete diet. That means that certain nutrients should be supplemented if you choose to guide your children to a healthier vegetarian diet. Calcium, protein, iron, and most other vital nutrients are available in abundant sources in a vegetarian diet. In fact, veg protein and calcium in particular are of a higher, more easily assimilated form than those nutrients from animal sources. Follow THIS LINK to learn more about developing a healthy eating pattern for your kids.
New reports are indicating that cows milk is especially questionable for growing children's health. A report HERE tells more about the dangers of cows milk. Please read it carefully.
The bottom line on this issue of your children's declining health is that the current trend of fast food, highly processed foods, too much sugar and white flour, and animal products as a major food source is damaging and dangerous to their health. If you want to help your children enjoy a healthier, longer life, teach them to eat right.
Yes, modern medicines can prolong life today, but why force your kids to become dependent on a growing pharmaceutical industry and more drugs to stay alive when just eating the right foods can help them even more.
Teach your children well!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
NUTS! Which Peanuts Aren't Safe???
The efficient folks at The Daily Green have compiled a nice list of which peanut products to avoid and which are safe.
"Nearly 300 brands have announced recalls related to the salmonella in peanut products since Feb. 1, and dozens more announced recalls in January," the article states. The article also includes a Widget created by the FDA which I've included here:
To read the full Daily Green article,> GO HERE
Eat-carefully!
STEPcoach
"Nearly 300 brands have announced recalls related to the salmonella in peanut products since Feb. 1, and dozens more announced recalls in January," the article states. The article also includes a Widget created by the FDA which I've included here:
FDA Product Recall List
To read the full Daily Green article,> GO HERE
Eat-carefully!
STEPcoach
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Poison Fruit - for your family
You know organic is better - but it costs more, sometimes it's really hard to find, and - what's the difference anyway? A visit to the Environmental Working Group (EWG) web site (link below) provides lots of useful information, but the best I found was a pocket guide for the grocery store.
In the guide, the Washington, DC-based EWG lists the 12 fruits and veggies that have the most and least pesticides on them. A wallet- sized card listing best and worst choices is even available for free download. That way, when you’re at the grocery store, you’ll know which conventionally grown items you can feel better about taking home and which ones you should avoid altogether.
The guide is based on results of nearly 43,000 tests the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration conducted between 2000 and 2004 for pesticides on produce.
Consider this scary fact: Eating the 12 most contaminated fruits and vegetables will expose a person to an average of about 15 pesticides a day, according to the EWG.
It gets worse: Almost 97 percent of peaches tested positive for pesticides, and almost 87 percent had residues of two or more pesticides. About 92 percent of apples tested positive, and 79 percent had residues of two or more pesticides.
Besides peaches and apples, other items on the dangerous end of the list are sweet bell peppers, celery, strawberries, pears, grapes, spinach, lettuce, and potatoes!
Safer veggies to buy (from best to not as good): Onions, avocados, sweet corn, pineapples, mango, asparagus, sweet peas, kiwi, bananas, cabbage, broccoli, and papaya.
Here's the link for The Environmental Working Group website
In the guide, the Washington, DC-based EWG lists the 12 fruits and veggies that have the most and least pesticides on them. A wallet- sized card listing best and worst choices is even available for free download. That way, when you’re at the grocery store, you’ll know which conventionally grown items you can feel better about taking home and which ones you should avoid altogether.
The guide is based on results of nearly 43,000 tests the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration conducted between 2000 and 2004 for pesticides on produce.
Consider this scary fact: Eating the 12 most contaminated fruits and vegetables will expose a person to an average of about 15 pesticides a day, according to the EWG.
It gets worse: Almost 97 percent of peaches tested positive for pesticides, and almost 87 percent had residues of two or more pesticides. About 92 percent of apples tested positive, and 79 percent had residues of two or more pesticides.
Besides peaches and apples, other items on the dangerous end of the list are sweet bell peppers, celery, strawberries, pears, grapes, spinach, lettuce, and potatoes!
Safer veggies to buy (from best to not as good): Onions, avocados, sweet corn, pineapples, mango, asparagus, sweet peas, kiwi, bananas, cabbage, broccoli, and papaya.
Here's the link for The Environmental Working Group website
Friday, January 23, 2009
Vegan Living: Gossip Girl's Vegan Joke
[from Huffington Post link]
UltraClassic said
"most vegan types I have seen appear weak and unhealthy and unable to fight their way out of a paper bag."
To which I reply:
"weak vegans? HA!" ...
* Ridgely Abele
Winner of eight national championships in karate
* Surya Bonaly
Olympic figure skating champion
* Brendan Brazier
Professional Ironman triathlete
* Peter Burwash
Davis Cup winner and professional tennis star
* Andreas Cahling
Swedish champion bodybuilder, Olympic gold medallist in the ski jump
* Chris Campbell
Olympic wrestling champion
* Nicky Cole
First woman to walk to the North Pole
* Ruth Heidrich
Six-time Ironwoman, USA track and field Master's champion
* Keith Holmes
World-champion middleweight boxer
* Desmond Howard
Professional football star, Heisman trophy winner
& many more at http://www.veganathlete.com/vegan_vegetarian_athletes.php
About Gossip Girl
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
UltraClassic said
"most vegan types I have seen appear weak and unhealthy and unable to fight their way out of a paper bag."
To which I reply:
"weak vegans? HA!" ...
* Ridgely Abele
Winner of eight national championships in karate
* Surya Bonaly
Olympic figure skating champion
* Brendan Brazier
Professional Ironman triathlete
* Peter Burwash
Davis Cup winner and professional tennis star
* Andreas Cahling
Swedish champion bodybuilder, Olympic gold medallist in the ski jump
* Chris Campbell
Olympic wrestling champion
* Nicky Cole
First woman to walk to the North Pole
* Ruth Heidrich
Six-time Ironwoman, USA track and field Master's champion
* Keith Holmes
World-champion middleweight boxer
* Desmond Howard
Professional football star, Heisman trophy winner
& many more at http://www.veganathlete.com/vegan_vegetarian_athletes.php
About Gossip Girl
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Monday, May 19, 2008
Mobile Phone Use While Pregnant May 'Seriously Damage Baby"
Good grief! A brand new study by American, British, and Russian universities and scientists has found, among other results, that mobile phone use is "not much lower than the risk to children's health from tobacco or alcohol".
What does this mean for soon-to-be moms and stepparents? A couple of things: first, damage to unborn children could be from radiation incurred during the use of the mobile device while mom's pregnant (so the Russians say). And second, the damage could also come from how parenting patterns are affected by mobile phone use, which is the American's contention. The Brits are just confused by the whole study.
Let's look at these factors and see how they may affect your stepfamily. First, regarding the radiation: there have been, for years, alarms going off about the increased microwave radiation which is the result of the rapid growth of cell phone towers across the world. Which only makes sense of a sort. Think of what happens in a microwave oven. High frequency (micro-) waves passing through the food causes the very molecules of the food matter to vibrate, which causes friction of the molecules together, which causes heat, thus cooking the food from the inside out. Cell phone towers send out microwave frequencies with the telephone signals to any and all receivers in range. Cell phones can receive these signals pretty much anywhere these days, which means the microwaves are present pretty much everywhere, right? So, if the phone is in your pocket or purse and it receives the signal (not only of an incoming call, but to update the time and to keep authorities aware of your global position), the receiver is focusing the incoming waves, which must be passing through you to get to the phone. Now, what do the microwaves do to a raw egg placed in the oven? What are they doing to your body? What about a baby inside the person holding the phone? That's sort of what the Russians are saying may be happening to the baby's brain.
The Americans, however in defense for the highly profitable mobile phone industry and convenience above all, say No, that couldn't be the problem, technology is our friend, it could never hurt us. So the problem must be the blame of the mother. (Since, as much of American thought turns these days, parents are the real problem every child must endure.) They posit that Mom, by using her cell phone, is neglecting her child's demands for attention.
Anything there? Well, maybe. How many times have you found yourself distracted by the ringing of that infernal, ever-present phone? We don't even get away from them on vacation or while playing with the kids anymore. And how many times do you see moms in traffic talking on the phone while driving and trying to keep an eye on kids in the back seat? Not you. I mean other people.
This begs the question - how much multi-tasking can even the most efficient mom do without someone suffering from lapses in attention? If your friend is engaged in a rapid-fire discussion with her buddy via the cell phone, how much quality time is junior getting from her? And if that's true of her own flesh and blood, how much easier is it to let her mind wonder from her husband's kids? (... his mind to wonder from his wife's kids?)
And what does that teach our kids about their importance to us versus the importance of the intrusive Phone? Hey! Could that be the reason so many kids today can't be without their pacifier phone? Have they learned from us that the most important relationships are at the other end of a wireless phone?
So where does that leave us? With the Brits, in confusion, I guess. Unless we want to really take a hard look at our behavior and our attitudes toward our families. Maybe we should take this whole damage-to-the-kids study as a wake up call (so to speak) that we need to switch the bloody things off every once in awhile and focus on more important relationships much closer at hand.
"Teach your children well ... and feed them on your dreams," as Crosby and company said. Teach them how to parent fully. So they can repay you someday with the same love you give them.
God bless y'all,
Bobby C
What does this mean for soon-to-be moms and stepparents? A couple of things: first, damage to unborn children could be from radiation incurred during the use of the mobile device while mom's pregnant (so the Russians say). And second, the damage could also come from how parenting patterns are affected by mobile phone use, which is the American's contention. The Brits are just confused by the whole study.
Let's look at these factors and see how they may affect your stepfamily. First, regarding the radiation: there have been, for years, alarms going off about the increased microwave radiation which is the result of the rapid growth of cell phone towers across the world. Which only makes sense of a sort. Think of what happens in a microwave oven. High frequency (micro-) waves passing through the food causes the very molecules of the food matter to vibrate, which causes friction of the molecules together, which causes heat, thus cooking the food from the inside out. Cell phone towers send out microwave frequencies with the telephone signals to any and all receivers in range. Cell phones can receive these signals pretty much anywhere these days, which means the microwaves are present pretty much everywhere, right? So, if the phone is in your pocket or purse and it receives the signal (not only of an incoming call, but to update the time and to keep authorities aware of your global position), the receiver is focusing the incoming waves, which must be passing through you to get to the phone. Now, what do the microwaves do to a raw egg placed in the oven? What are they doing to your body? What about a baby inside the person holding the phone? That's sort of what the Russians are saying may be happening to the baby's brain.
The Americans, however in defense for the highly profitable mobile phone industry and convenience above all, say No, that couldn't be the problem, technology is our friend, it could never hurt us. So the problem must be the blame of the mother. (Since, as much of American thought turns these days, parents are the real problem every child must endure.) They posit that Mom, by using her cell phone, is neglecting her child's demands for attention.
Anything there? Well, maybe. How many times have you found yourself distracted by the ringing of that infernal, ever-present phone? We don't even get away from them on vacation or while playing with the kids anymore. And how many times do you see moms in traffic talking on the phone while driving and trying to keep an eye on kids in the back seat? Not you. I mean other people.
This begs the question - how much multi-tasking can even the most efficient mom do without someone suffering from lapses in attention? If your friend is engaged in a rapid-fire discussion with her buddy via the cell phone, how much quality time is junior getting from her? And if that's true of her own flesh and blood, how much easier is it to let her mind wonder from her husband's kids? (... his mind to wonder from his wife's kids?)
And what does that teach our kids about their importance to us versus the importance of the intrusive Phone? Hey! Could that be the reason so many kids today can't be without their pacifier phone? Have they learned from us that the most important relationships are at the other end of a wireless phone?
So where does that leave us? With the Brits, in confusion, I guess. Unless we want to really take a hard look at our behavior and our attitudes toward our families. Maybe we should take this whole damage-to-the-kids study as a wake up call (so to speak) that we need to switch the bloody things off every once in awhile and focus on more important relationships much closer at hand.
"Teach your children well ... and feed them on your dreams," as Crosby and company said. Teach them how to parent fully. So they can repay you someday with the same love you give them.
God bless y'all,
Bobby C
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)